When reviewing or reporting about games, journalists can use
New Games Journalism (NGJ), Old Games Journalism (OGJ) or usually a combination
of both. Old Games Journalism will often focus on a specific aspect of the game
and will provide you with an analysis of that aspect. This will provide you
with much more technical information about a game, which I often find, isn’t
enough to allow me to make a decision on whether I want to buy that game.
New Games Journalism are not what you would normally expect
from a review of a game. This is because these articles often include the
author’s response to their own experience of the game. The author will often
play the game and experience it for themselves and then share their thoughts
and feelings on what they experienced. Anecdotes will often be included in NGJ
as the author shares stories of what happened although different players may
experience different things in the game.
I personally prefer NGJ as it gives me a more realistic
image of what it would be like to play the game and allows me to decide much
more easily whether it is something I would enjoy. However, I feel like there
should be some OGJ involved in all reviews as it is important to know how well
often regarding the controls, graphics and options as if a game is very weak in
one of those regards I often find it can spoil the whole game.
No comments:
Post a Comment